Delhi High Court Rules NSE Is a Public Authority Under the RTI Act

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the National Stock Exchange (NSE) is a public authority under the RTI Act, which means citizens can seek information from India's largest stock exchange under the Right to Information framework. A division bench delivered the ruling on July 1, 2026 in an appeal titled National Stock Exchange of India Ltd versus Central Information Commission, dismissing the exchange's challenge to an earlier single judge decision.

The Court held that the NSE falls within the definition of public authority in Section 2(h) of the RTI Act on two independent grounds: the statutory recognition that is indispensable for it to function as a stock exchange, and the deep and pervasive control that the government and SEBI exercise over it.

How the Court Read Section 2(h)

Section 2(h) of the RTI Act defines a public authority to include bodies established or constituted by or under law or by notification or order of the appropriate government, and extends to bodies controlled or substantially financed by the government. The bench reasoned that although the NSE is incorporated as a private company, it can function as a stock exchange only after statutory recognition granted by SEBI, acting under powers delegated by the Central Government. That recognition brings it within the first limb of Section 2(h).

Separately, the Court found that the statutory framework governing recognised stock exchanges subjects the NSE to deep and pervasive governmental control, satisfying the control test in the second limb. Either route independently makes the exchange a public authority.

What Information Can Now Be Sought

As a public authority, the NSE must appoint public information officers, respond to RTI applications within statutory timelines and disclose information subject to the exemptions in the Act, such as commercial confidence and third party information, which will still be tested case by case. Investors, researchers and journalists can now use the RTI route for information about the exchange's regulatory and administrative functioning. The filing process is explained in this guide on how to file an RTI application online.

Exemptions under Section 8 of the RTI Act will remain a live battleground, because market sensitive information and trade secrets enjoy protection. The ruling establishes the obligation to answer, not an obligation to disclose everything.

The usual RTI machinery now applies to the exchange. An applicant who receives no reply or an unsatisfactory reply can file a first appeal before the designated appellate authority within the organisation, and thereafter a second appeal before the Central Information Commission. Penalty provisions for unjustified refusal or delay apply to information officers in the same way they apply in any other public authority, which gives the new obligation real teeth.

Why the Decision Matters for Market Governance

The NSE sits at the centre of Indian capital markets, performing quasi regulatory functions such as listing supervision, member discipline and market surveillance. Subjecting it to RTI accountability aligns transparency obligations with the public character of those functions. The decision arrives amid rapid regulatory change in the securities market, including SEBI's introduction of a closing auction session for stock prices and the GARUDA green channel framework for AIFs.

Greater informational access can sharpen public scrutiny of how the exchange performs these functions, complementing SEBI's supervisory role rather than replacing it. For listed companies and brokers, the practical effect is indirect but real: correspondence with the exchange, inspection outcomes and administrative decisions may become reachable through RTI requests, subject to the exemptions, which changes how sensitive communications with the exchange should be drafted.

What Happens Next

The exchange may carry the question to the Supreme Court, and the scope of exemptions will be worked out through individual RTI disputes before the Central Information Commission and the courts. Market participants should watch whether the reasoning extends to other recognised exchanges and market infrastructure institutions, which share the same statutory recognition and control framework. Financial sector transparency continues to expand elsewhere too, as seen in SEBI's approval of intraday borrowing for mutual funds and related disclosure driven reforms.

Related Reading

See why courts are also protecting bank customers in the ruling that banks cannot freeze an entire account on a future apprehension.

Track how banking regulators are tightening governance in the RBI draft model risk management guidance for banks.

Key Takeaways

The Delhi High Court has held that the National Stock Exchange is a public authority under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, both because SEBI's statutory recognition is indispensable to its functioning and because of deep and pervasive government control. Citizens can now file RTI applications with the NSE, though statutory exemptions for commercial confidence will still apply. The ruling strengthens transparency over quasi regulatory functions at the heart of India's capital markets. Applicants should frame requests around the exchange's regulatory and administrative functions, and expect exemption objections on market sensitive material, which the Central Information Commission will test case by case.