Patna Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Khan Sir in Coaching Centre Firing Case

Kaustav Chowdhury
5 hours ago
4 min read

On June 9, 2026, a Patna court granted interim protection from arrest to educator and YouTuber Faizal Khan, popularly known as Khan Sir, in connection with a criminal case arising from a firing incident at his coaching institute, Khan Global Studies (KGS), in Patna's Musallahpur Hat area. The Principal District and Sessions Judge passed the order on Khan Sir's anticipatory bail application, directing that no coercive action, including arrest, shall be taken against him pending the next hearing on June 20, 2026.

The Incident: What Happened on June 2, 2026?

According to the prosecution, on June 2, 2026, a group of approximately 15 to 20 persons gathered outside the KGS coaching institute, vandalised the premises, pelted stones, and physically assaulted one of the institute's security guards. The immediate trigger for this gathering has not been conclusively established in court proceedings so far.

Following the altercation, videos surfaced on social media showing security personnel associated with the institute firing shots, allegedly in the air. The videos went viral and drew immediate police response. On June 4, 2026, police arrested Deepak Kumar and Talebar Singh, the two security guards attached to the coaching institute, from the premises.

An FIR was registered at Kadamkuan Police Station under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including provisions relating to attempt to murder, as well as offences under the Arms Act, 1959. Khan Sir was named in the FIR, though his precise role in the incident is contested.

The Anticipatory Bail Application

Khan Sir moved an anticipatory bail application before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Patna, seeking protection from arrest. Anticipatory bail in India is governed by Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, which replaced Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Under this provision, a person who has reason to believe that they may be arrested for a non-bailable offence can apply to the Sessions Court or High Court for a direction that they be released on bail if arrested.

For a detailed analysis of anticipatory bail provisions under the new criminal law framework, see Anticipatory Bail in India: How Section 482 BNSS Works.

The Court's Order

The court granted interim protection, directing that no coercive action, including arrest, shall be taken against Khan Sir as long as the interim protection remains in effect. However, the court clarified that investigators are permitted to question him in connection with the case. The distinction is important: interim protection prevents physical arrest and custody but does not shield the accused from investigation.

The court scheduled the next hearing for June 20, 2026, when the anticipatory bail application will be heard in full. The interim protection operates until then. If the court grants regular anticipatory bail on June 20, Khan Sir would be protected from arrest for the duration specified in the order, subject to conditions the court may impose.

Legal Framework: Anticipatory Bail Under BNSS 2023

Section 482 of the BNSS 2023 largely reproduces the earlier Section 438 CrPC provisions but includes certain modifications. The court considering an anticipatory bail application must evaluate: (a) the nature and gravity of the accusation, (b) the antecedents of the applicant, (c) the possibility of the applicant fleeing justice, and (d) whether the accusation has been made to humiliate or injure the applicant by arresting them.

The Supreme Court has held that anticipatory bail is a right of the accused, not a privilege, and that courts should lean in favour of liberty when the conditions are met. However, in cases involving serious offences like attempt to murder and Arms Act violations, courts exercise greater caution and may impose stringent conditions, including regular appearance before the investigating officer, surrender of passport, and prohibition on leaving the jurisdiction.

Broader Significance

This case has drawn attention because of Khan Sir's status as one of India's most popular educators, with millions of followers on YouTube and social media. The case raises questions about the liability of institutional heads for acts committed by their employees or security personnel, particularly when the employer is not directly involved in the immediate act.

Under Indian criminal law, vicarious liability is generally not imposed in criminal cases unless a specific statute provides for it. The prosecution would need to establish Khan Sir's direct involvement in, or instigation of, the firing incident, or demonstrate that he had knowledge and failed to prevent it. The BNS provisions on abetment and criminal conspiracy would be relevant in this assessment.

Key Takeaways

1. The Patna court granted interim protection from arrest to Khan Sir on June 9, 2026, in the coaching centre firing case, with the next hearing scheduled for June 20.

2. The FIR was registered under BNS provisions including attempt to murder, and under the Arms Act, 1959, after security personnel were filmed firing shots on June 2.

3. Interim protection prevents arrest but allows investigators to question the accused; it is a temporary measure pending full hearing of the anticipatory bail application.

4. Under Section 482 BNSS, courts evaluate the gravity of accusation, antecedents, flight risk, and whether the accusation is intended to humiliate the applicant.

5. The case raises important questions about the criminal liability of institutional heads for acts committed by employees or security personnel.