West Bengal Post-Poll Violence 2026: Calcutta High Court Orders Safe Return of Displaced Persons
- Kaustav Chowdhury

- May 18
- 3 min read
The Calcutta High Court has issued interim directions to the West Bengal State Police to ensure the safe return of all persons displaced from their homes, shops, and properties during the post-poll violence that followed the 2026 West Bengal Assembly election results. The Court directed that protection must be provided regardless of the political affiliation of the displaced persons. The directions came in response to multiple Public Interest Litigations (PILs) alleging widespread violence, burning of shops, and displacement of families in several districts after the election results were announced. The case gained national attention when former Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee personally appeared before the Court in advocate's robes to argue on behalf of her party.
What Happened: Post-Poll Violence After 2026 West Bengal Elections
The 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections resulted in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) securing a majority, ending the Trinamool Congress (TMC) government's tenure in the state. In the aftermath of the results, reports of violence emerged from several districts. According to the PILs filed before the Calcutta High Court, the violence included burning of approximately 60 shops in Khejuri, physical assaults, destruction of property, and displacement of families from their homes. The petitioners alleged that the violence was politically motivated and that displaced persons were unable to return to their homes due to a prevailing atmosphere of fear and intimidation. Multiple media reports and fact-finding teams documented the incidents, prompting the filing of PILs seeking judicial intervention.
Calcutta High Court Interim Directions on Displaced Persons
The Calcutta High Court, hearing the PILs, issued specific interim directions aimed at restoring normalcy and protecting the rights of displaced persons. The Court directed the State Police to ensure the safe return of every citizen who has been illegally thrown out of their shop, house, or property due to post-poll violence. The Court emphasised that this protection must be provided irrespective of the person's political affiliation. The police were directed to maintain law and order in affected areas and create conditions that allow displaced persons to return without fear. The Court also constituted a three-member committee to oversee the return and rehabilitation process, monitor the situation on the ground, and report back to the Court on compliance with its directions.
Mamata Banerjee Appears as Advocate Before Calcutta High Court
In an unusual development, former Chief Minister and TMC leader Mamata Banerjee appeared before the Calcutta High Court wearing advocate's robes and white bands to argue in the post-poll violence PILs. She urged the Court to protect the citizens of Bengal and defended the actions of her party. Her appearance in legal attire prompted the Bar Council of India (BCI) to seek detailed information from the Bar Council of West Bengal regarding her enrollment and practice status as an advocate. In a letter dated May 14, 2026, the BCI directed the State Bar Council to furnish records relating to Banerjee's enrollment, continuation on the State Roll, and any suspension or cessation of practice. The State Bar Council was given two days to respond. The incident raised questions about the rules governing the practice of law by persons who have held public office.
Legal Framework: Post-Poll Violence and Constitutional Remedies
Post-poll violence is not new to Indian elections, and the judiciary has historically intervened to protect the fundamental rights of affected citizens. Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right to live in one's home without fear of violence. Article 19(1)(d) guarantees the right to move freely throughout the territory of India, and Article 19(1)(e) guarantees the right to reside and settle in any part of India. The High Court's directions in the present case are grounded in these fundamental rights. PILs under Article 226 of the Constitution allow any person to approach the High Court when fundamental rights are violated or threatened. The West Bengal post-poll violence case follows the precedent set by similar judicial interventions after the 2021 West Bengal elections, when the Calcutta High Court had ordered a CBI investigation into post-poll violence allegations.
Key Takeaways
The Calcutta High Court has directed West Bengal police to ensure the safe return of all persons displaced by post-poll violence, regardless of political affiliation. A three-member committee has been constituted to monitor the rehabilitation process. Former CM Mamata Banerjee's appearance in advocate's robes has triggered a BCI inquiry into her enrollment status. The Court's intervention is grounded in fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution. The matter remains sub judice and the Court is expected to continue monitoring the situation through further hearings.

Comments