What are the grounds for divorce in India?

Grounds for Divorce in India: Legal Guide for Common Citizens

Introduction

Divorce laws in India, particularly under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA), aim to balance respect for marriage as a social institution with individual freedom and well‑being. Beyond Hindu law, similar grounds exist under the Special Marriage Act (SMA) and other personal laws.

Key Legal Provisions

1. Adultery – Section 13(1)(i), HMA

Voluntary sexual intercourse by one spouse with another person qualifies as adultery. Though Section 497 IPC criminalizing adultery was struck down in Joseph Shine v. UOI (2018), adultery remains a valid civil ground for divorce.

2. Cruelty – Section 13(1)(ia), HMA

Includes physical or mental cruelty. Courts interpret mental cruelty broadly—e.g., frequently humiliating remarks about physical disability constitute cruelty (Orissa HC, 2025). Landmark judgments like Dr. N.G. Dastane v. S. Dastane (1975) and Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh (2007) emphasize cumulative emotional abuse.

3. Desertion – Section 13(1)(ib), HMA

When a spouse abandons the other without reasonable cause, for continuous two years or more immediately before filing, desertion can be proved.

4. Conversion – Section 13(1)(ii), HMA

When a spouse converts to another religion, ceases to be Hindu, divorce becomes permissible.

5. Mental Disorder – Section 13(1)(iii), HMA

Unsoundness of mind or mental disorder making it unreasonable to live together is valid. The law also allows consent for divorce if mental disorder is incurable after reasonable treatment.

6. Leprosy – Section 13(1)(iv), HMA

A spouse suffering from a virulent, incurable form of leprosy is grounds for divorce.

7. Venereal Disease – Section 13(1)(v), HMA

A communicable venereal disease qualifies as a ground.

8. Renunciation – Section 13(1)(vi), HMA

If a spouse renounces worldly life by entering religious orders, divorce is permitted.

9. Presumption of Death – Section 13(1)(vii), HMA

If a spouse has not been heard from for at least seven years, the other may file for divorce.

10. Special Grounds Available Only to a Wife – Section 13(2), HMA

Applied uniquely for the wife, including:

• Husband marries another post commencement of first marriage.

• Husband guilty of rape, sodomy, or bestiality.

• Husband secures maintenance under CrPC Section 125 or HAM Act Section 18 and couple fails to cohabit for a year.

• Marriage before age 15: wife renounces before 18.

11. Mutual Consent Divorce – Section 13B, HMA

Both spouses can jointly petition for divorce, agreeing to live separately and amicably dissolve the marriage. A cooling-off period of six months is stipulated, though courts may waive it (e.g., Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, 2017).

12. Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage

Though not in HMA, the Supreme Court has recognized “irretrievable breakdown” as a ground in Navin Kohli v. Neelu Kohli (2006) and again affirmed in S.C. in 2023 via Law Library of Congress report. It also upheld this ground under Article 142 for direct petitions (Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, 2023).

13. Other Personal Laws

• Special Marriage Act, 1954 mirrors HMA grounds.

• Muslim Law: Governed by Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 and judiciary; also affected by Triple Talaq Act, 2019.

• Christian and Parsi Laws specify similar grounds under their respective acts.

In‑Depth Analysis

a) Proving Mental Cruelty & Adultery

Although adultery remains a ground, proof is often difficult due to requirement of evidence. Since Joseph Shine, it’s decriminalized, reducing stigma but still a civil ground. Mental cruelty is highly fact‑specific. Recent judgments have broadened its reach—from repeated taunts to false criminal allegations (K. Srinivas Rao and Narendra v. Meena). Cumulative emotional harm is considered equally damaging as physical cruelty.

b) Mutual Consent: Court’s Flexibility

The six‑month period under Section 13B exists to encourage reflection before dissolution. However, the Supreme Court has waived it in irreparable cases, especially under Article 142, recognizing the need for expedient endings to broken marriages.

c) Irretrievable Breakdown: Launching Reform Debate

While acknowledged by courts, the inclusion of irretrievable breakdown in the HMA via legislation failed with the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010, which lapsed without passage. Parliament may revisit the issue.

d) Maintenance—Post‑Divorce Support

The Supreme Court in June 2025 significantly raised permanent alimony in a 17‑year case to ₹50,000/month with periodic increases, directing courts to ensure economic fairness. This shows evolving sensitivity to post-divorce welfare.

e) Misuse of Dowry‑related Divorce Grounds

Divorce petitions often follow criminal accusations under Section 498A IPC. Recently, in May 2025, the Supreme Court flagged abuse of Section 498A, emphasizing legal balance and necessity for credible proof.

Case Laws & Regulatory Updates

Case	Ground	Key Holding
Navin Kohli v. Neelu Kohli (2006)	Cruelty; irretrievable breakdown	Recognized irretrievable breakdown as valid
Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017)	Mutual consent divorce	Cooling period not mandatory
Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023)	Article 142 divorce	SC can directly grant divorce on irretrievable breakdown
Orissa HC, June 2025	Mental cruelty	Insulting remarks about physical disability sufficed as cruelty
Supreme Court, May 2025	Alimony	Revision of permanent alimony to ₹50,000/month
Supreme Court, May 2025	Criminal misuse	Acquittal and warning on misuse of Section 498A

Challenges & Grey Areas

1. Evidence – especially in adultery/cruelty cases: Courts demand proof; “mere general allegations are insufficient” (Swapna Ghose).

2. Irretrievable Breakdown: Accepted in judgments, but lack of statutory clarity leaves practice inconsistent.

3. Personal laws divergence: Muslim, Christian, Parsi laws vary; Muslim women’s rights post-divorce fall under separate statute (Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986).

4. Misuse of dowry provisions: Courts now call for procedural safeguards following misuse ruling.

5. Alimony discretion: Uneven application across courts; recent SC direction aids consistency, but gaps remain.

Conclusion

India’s divorce laws balance respect for marriage with individual dignity, offering nine clear grounds under the HMA, along with mutual consent and, increasingly, irretrievable breakdown. Judicial interpretations—especially on mental cruelty, alimony, and procedural efficiency—continue to evolve. For individuals, the takeaway is clear: divorce requires solid legal grounds, credible evidence, and thoughtful presentation of personal hardship. And if both parties agree, mutual consent divorce remains the smoothest path—helped along by court leniency when suffering is clear.

Rights of a woman in divorce in India | Rights of a man in divorce in India | Grounds for divorce for wife | Grounds for divorce for husband | Grounds for divorce under Section 13 | Grounds for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act | Special Grounds for Divorce in India